A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week clinical trial in 269 adult patients with active AS who had an inadequate response (inadequate clinical response or intolerance) to ≥2 NSAIDs. Approximately 80% of the population were to be bDMARD-naïve, and approximately 20% were to have an IR to ≤2 TNF blockers or to have prior bDMARD (TNF blocker or non-TNF blocker) use without IR. XELJANZ is approved for use in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to TNF blockers. Patients were randomized and treated with XELJANZ 5 mg BID or placebo for 16 weeks of blinded treatment and then all received treatment of XELJANZ 5 mg BID for an additional 32 weeks. At baseline, 207 patients were bDMARD-naïve and 62 patients were TNF blocker-IR or bDMARD users (non-IR). NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, MTX, sulfasalazine, or oral corticosteroids were allowed if patients were on a stable dosage at baseline. Approximately 7% and 21% of patients used concomitant MTX or sulfasalazine, respectively, from baseline to week 16. 22% of patients had an inadequate response to 1 or 2 TNF blockers. The mean age of patients in the trial was 41.1 years, and most patients were male (83.3%). Patients in the trial had a mean disease duration of 13.5 years since onset of AS symptoms, mean disease duration since diagnosis of 7.8 years, and a mean BASDAI score of 6.5 at baseline. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response at week 16. To control for type I error at the 5% level for primary and certain secondary endpoints, 4 families of efficacy endpoints were tested in hierarchical sequences with a step-down approach. The first family, the global type I error–controlled endpoints at week 16, included: ASAS20 response; ASAS40 response; ΔASDAS(CRP); ΔhsCRP; and ΔBASMI. Upon meeting statistical significance for ASAS20 response at week 16, the second family included ΔASAS components at week 16, and included testing for Δtotal back pain. The third family, ASAS20 response over time, and the fourth family, ASAS40 response over time, were each tested in the following sequence: weeks 16, 12, 8, 4, and 2. In each family, statistical significance could be declared only if the prior endpoint (or time point) in the sequence met the requirements for significance. Nonresponder imputation was applied to missing data for ASAS response rates.1-3